Panama vs Philippines: Completion rate, primary education, rural — Value — All age ranges or
Completion rate, primary education, rural — Value — All age ranges or over time
- Panama
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 94.64 % against 94.5 % in Panama, a difference of 0.14 %.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Panama ranks 44th and Philippines ranks 43rd of 76 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.85 % | 80.26 % | 6.59 % | Panama |
| 2010s | 92.25 % | 88.16 % | 4.09 % | Panama |
| 2020s | 94.9 % | 94.64 % | 0.26 % | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, primary education, rural — value — all age ranges or, Panama or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 94.64 % against 94.5 % in Panama as of 2022.
- What is the difference in completion rate, primary education, rural — value — all age ranges or between Panama and Philippines?
- 0.14 %, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Philippines?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2022.
- How do Panama and Philippines rank globally for completion rate, primary education, rural — value — all age ranges or?
- Panama ranks 44th and Philippines ranks 43rd of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, primary education, rural — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.