Kenya vs Sao Tome and Principe: Completion rate, primary education, rural — Value — All age ranges or
Completion rate, primary education, rural — Value — All age ranges or over time
- Kenya
- Sao Tome and Principe
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 89.46 % against 87.53 % in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 1.93 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 47th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 49th of 76 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 1 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Sao Tome and Principe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.06 % | 55.66 % | 7.4 % | Kenya |
| 2010s | 79.72 % | 82.34 % | 2.62 % | Sao Tome and Principe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, primary education, rural — value — all age ranges or, Kenya or Sao Tome and Principe?
- Kenya, at 89.46 % against 87.53 % in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in completion rate, primary education, rural — value — all age ranges or between Kenya and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 1.93 %, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Sao Tome and Principe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Kenya and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for completion rate, primary education, rural — value — all age ranges or?
- Kenya ranks 47th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 49th of 76 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, primary education, rural — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.