Luxembourg vs Panama: Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — Male
Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — Male over time
- Luxembourg
- Panama
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 94.4 % against 94.2 % in Panama, a difference of 0.2 %.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 29th and Panama ranks 30th of 73 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 95.32 % | 77.53 % | 17.8 % | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 92.27 % | 83.08 % | 9.18 % | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 94.4 % | 89.3 % | 5.1 % | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — male, Luxembourg or Panama?
- Luxembourg, at 94.4 % against 94.2 % in Panama as of 2021.
- What is the difference in completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — male between Luxembourg and Panama?
- 0.2 %, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Panama?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2021.
- How do Luxembourg and Panama rank globally for completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — male?
- Luxembourg ranks 29th and Panama ranks 30th of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.