China, mainland vs Luxembourg: Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — Male
Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — Male over time
- China, mainland
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 94.4 % against 93.47 % in China, mainland, a difference of 0.93 %.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Luxembourg ahead.
China, mainland ranks 32nd and Luxembourg ranks 29th of 73 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — male, China, mainland or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 94.4 % against 93.47 % in China, mainland as of 2021.
- What is the difference in completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — male between China, mainland and Luxembourg?
- 0.93 %, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China, mainland and Luxembourg?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do China, mainland and Luxembourg rank globally for completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — male?
- China, mainland ranks 32nd and Luxembourg ranks 29th of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.