Dominican Republic vs Zimbabwe: Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — Female
Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — Female over time
- Dominican Republic
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 92.7 % against 92.06 % in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.64 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 41st and Zimbabwe ranks 44th of 73 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 83 % | 80.5 % | 2.5 % | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 88 % | 89.53 % | 1.53 % | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — female, Dominican Republic or Zimbabwe?
- Dominican Republic, at 92.7 % against 92.06 % in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
- What is the difference in completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — female between Dominican Republic and Zimbabwe?
- 0.64 %, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Zimbabwe?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2015.
- How do Dominican Republic and Zimbabwe rank globally for completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — female?
- Dominican Republic ranks 41st and Zimbabwe ranks 44th of 73 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — Female — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.