El Salvador vs Jordan: Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — All age
Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — All age over time
- El Salvador
- Jordan
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 88.05 % against 83.8 % in El Salvador, a difference of 4.25 %.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.1 times El Salvador's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
El Salvador ranks 52nd and Jordan ranks 49th of 77 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 71.71 % | 87.41 % | 15.69 % | Jordan |
| 2010s | 80.03 % | 89.07 % | 9.04 % | Jordan |
| 2020s | 83.8 % | 88.05 % | 4.25 % | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — all age, El Salvador or Jordan?
- Jordan, at 88.05 % against 83.8 % in El Salvador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — all age between El Salvador and Jordan?
- 4.25 %, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Jordan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2023.
- How do El Salvador and Jordan rank globally for completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — all age?
- El Salvador ranks 52nd and Jordan ranks 49th of 77 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.