Cambodia vs Sierra Leone: Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — All age
Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — All age over time
- Cambodia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 64.73 % against 64.11 % in Cambodia, a difference of 0.62 %.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 63rd and Sierra Leone ranks 62nd of 77 countries.
Cambodia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.81 % | 37.71 % | 6.1 % | Cambodia |
| 2010s | 61.91 % | 53.26 % | 8.66 % | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — all age, Cambodia or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 64.73 % against 64.11 % in Cambodia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — all age between Cambodia and Sierra Leone?
- 0.62 %, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Sierra Leone?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2019.
- How do Cambodia and Sierra Leone rank globally for completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — value — all age?
- Cambodia ranks 63rd and Sierra Leone ranks 62nd of 77 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, lower secondary education, urban — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.