Kenya vs Panama: Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — Male
Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — Male over time
- Kenya
- Panama
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 81.95 % against 79 % in Panama, a difference of 2.95 %.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Panama ahead.
Kenya ranks 41st and Panama ranks 43rd of 72 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 41.15 % | 48 % | 6.85 % | Panama |
| 2010s | 62.58 % | 66.75 % | 4.17 % | Panama |
| 2020s | 69.3 % | 76.75 % | 7.45 % | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — male, Kenya or Panama?
- Kenya, at 81.95 % against 79 % in Panama as of 2024.
- What is the difference in completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — male between Kenya and Panama?
- 2.95 %, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Panama?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2022.
- How do Kenya and Panama rank globally for completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — male?
- Kenya ranks 41st and Panama ranks 43rd of 72 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.