Ecuador vs South Africa: Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — Male
Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — Male over time
- Ecuador
- South Africa
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 89.1 % against 85.95 % in South Africa, a difference of 3.15 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was South Africa ahead.
Ecuador ranks 33rd and South Africa ranks 35th of 72 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 75.75 % | 78.22 % | 2.47 % | South Africa |
| 2020s | 88.03 % | 88.47 % | 0.4475 % | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — male, Ecuador or South Africa?
- Ecuador, at 89.1 % against 85.95 % in South Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — male between Ecuador and South Africa?
- 3.15 %, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — male?
- Ecuador ranks 33rd and South Africa ranks 35th of 72 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.