Brazil vs Paraguay: Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — Male
Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — Male over time
- Brazil
- Paraguay
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 78.2 % against 77.65 % in Paraguay, a difference of 0.55 %.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Paraguay ahead.
Brazil ranks 44th and Paraguay ranks 45th of 72 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Paraguay in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 37.03 % | 43.03 % | 5.99 % | Paraguay |
| 2010s | 63.69 % | 63.78 % | 0.0944 % | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 76.53 % | 74.55 % | 1.98 % | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — male, Brazil or Paraguay?
- Brazil, at 78.2 % against 77.65 % in Paraguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — male between Brazil and Paraguay?
- 0.55 %, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Paraguay?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
- How do Brazil and Paraguay rank globally for completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — male?
- Brazil ranks 44th and Paraguay ranks 45th of 72 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — Male — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.