Latvia vs Norway: Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — All age
Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — All age over time
- Latvia
- Norway
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 100 % against 100 % in Norway, a difference of 0 %.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Norway ahead.
Latvia ranks 1st and Norway ranks 1st of 78 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 98.28 % | 99.25 % | 0.968 % | Norway |
| 2020s | 100 % | 99.72 % | 0.285 % | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — all age, Latvia or Norway?
- Latvia, at 100 % against 100 % in Norway as of 2021.
- What is the difference in completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — all age between Latvia and Norway?
- 0 %, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Norway?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2021.
- How do Latvia and Norway rank globally for completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — all age?
- Latvia ranks 1st and Norway ranks 1st of 78 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.