Dominican Republic vs Indonesia: Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — All age
Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — All age over time
- Dominican Republic
- Indonesia
How they compare
Indonesia currently reports 85.38 % against 84.9 % in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.48 %.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Indonesia ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 40th and Indonesia ranks 39th of 78 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Indonesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.2 % | 53.65 % | 3.55 % | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 76.5 % | 73.35 % | 3.15 % | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 87.5 % | 85.38 % | 2.12 % | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — all age, Dominican Republic or Indonesia?
- Indonesia, at 85.38 % against 84.9 % in Dominican Republic as of 2022.
- What is the difference in completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — all age between Dominican Republic and Indonesia?
- 0.48 %, with Indonesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Indonesia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2022.
- How do Dominican Republic and Indonesia rank globally for completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — value — all age?
- Dominican Republic ranks 40th and Indonesia ranks 39th of 78 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Completion rate, lower secondary education, rural — Value — All age ranges or no breakdown by age — Rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Suite of Gender Indicators presents a set of indicators relevant to agrifood systems that are disaggregated by sex, with the aim of highlighting gender differences across agrifood systems. The initial set of indicators is based on those used in FAO’s 2023 Status of Women in Agrifood Systems (SWAFS) report and on the recommendations of an expert consultation held in December 2023, and covers key dimensions including economic participation, governance, agency, social norms, assets and services, education, health, and nutrition. Indicator selection was informed by expert judgment and by the availability of data with sufficient geographic and temporal coverage to enable meaningful comparisons across regions and over time. While most indicators are produced and published by FAO and other international organizations, the objective of this domain is to provide a one-stop shop for sex-disaggregated data on agrifood systems.