San Marino vs Trinidad and Tobago: Communications, computer, etc.
Communications, computer, etc. over time
- San Marino
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 37.3% against 35.7% in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 1.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
San Marino ranks 93rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 96th of 198 countries.
Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | San Marino | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 40.5% | 51.2% | 10.7% | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2020s | 38.8% | 43.5% | 4.7% | Trinidad and Tobago |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communications, computer, etc., San Marino or Trinidad and Tobago?
- San Marino, at 37.3% against 35.7% in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
- What is the difference in communications, computer, etc. between San Marino and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 1.6%, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2023.
- How do San Marino and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for communications, computer, etc.?
- San Marino ranks 93rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 96th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Communications, computer, information, and other services cover international telecommunications; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; personal, cultural, and recreational services; manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others; and maintenance and repair services and government services not included elsewhere. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.