Russian Federation vs Timor-Leste: Communications, computer, etc.
Communications, computer, etc. over time
- Russian Federation
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 15.4% against 15.2% in Russian Federation, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Russian Federation ranks 162nd and Timor-Leste ranks 160th of 198 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Russian Federation averaged higher in 1 and Timor-Leste in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Russian Federation | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.1% | 70.4% | 37.3% | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 36.2% | 14.6% | 21.6% | Russian Federation |
| 2020s | 30.4% | 44.9% | 14.5% | Timor-Leste |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communications, computer, etc., Russian Federation or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 15.4% against 15.2% in Russian Federation as of 2025.
- What is the difference in communications, computer, etc. between Russian Federation and Timor-Leste?
- 0.2%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Timor-Leste?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Russian Federation and Timor-Leste rank globally for communications, computer, etc.?
- Russian Federation ranks 162nd and Timor-Leste ranks 160th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Communications, computer, information, and other services cover international telecommunications; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; personal, cultural, and recreational services; manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others; and maintenance and repair services and government services not included elsewhere. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.