Malta vs Sweden: Communications, computer, etc.
Communications, computer, etc. over time
- Malta
- Sweden
How they compare
Malta currently reports 75.2% against 73.3% in Sweden, a difference of 1.9%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1971 it was Sweden ahead.
Malta ranks 4th and Sweden ranks 5th of 198 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 11.0% | 24.7% | 13.7% | Sweden |
| 1980s | 10.6% | 28.1% | 17.5% | Sweden |
| 1990s | 18.6% | 26.2% | 7.6% | Sweden |
| 2000s | 37.1% | 49.1% | 12.1% | Sweden |
| 2010s | 63.3% | 52.6% | 10.7% | Malta |
| 2020s | 78.0% | 71.6% | 6.4% | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communications, computer, etc., Malta or Sweden?
- Malta, at 75.2% against 73.3% in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in communications, computer, etc. between Malta and Sweden?
- 1.9%, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Sweden?
- 54 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2024.
- How do Malta and Sweden rank globally for communications, computer, etc.?
- Malta ranks 4th and Sweden ranks 5th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Communications, computer, information, and other services cover international telecommunications; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; personal, cultural, and recreational services; manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others; and maintenance and repair services and government services not included elsewhere. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.