Latvia vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD): Communications, computer, etc.

Latvia
47.6%
in 2025
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
23.1%
in 2024
Latvia rank
46th
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) rank
44th

Communications, computer, etc. over time

  • Latvia
  • Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
1020304050197720012025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 47.6% against 23.1% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 24.5%.

That makes Latvia's figure about 2.1 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ahead.

Latvia ranks 46th and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 44th of 198 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) Difference Ahead
2000s 28.4% 28.4% 0.0% Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
2010s 34.6% 22.3% 12.3% Latvia
2020s 48.9% 23.2% 25.8% Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher communications, computer, etc., Latvia or Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
Latvia, at 47.6% against 23.1% in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) as of 2025.
What is the difference in communications, computer, etc. between Latvia and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
24.5%, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)?
17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
How do Latvia and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for communications, computer, etc.?
Latvia ranks 46th and Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 44th of 198 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD): Communications, computer, etc.. Statizoid, drawing on Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF). Retrieved 19 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/communications-computer-etc-percent-of-service-imports-bop/latvia/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-ida-and-ibrd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/communications-computer-etc-percent-of-service-imports-bop/latvia/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-ida-and-ibrd/">Latvia vs Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD): Communications, computer, etc.</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP)
Unit
% of service imports, BoP
Source
Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
245 places, 9,650 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Communications, computer, information, and other services cover international telecommunications; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; personal, cultural, and recreational services; manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others; and maintenance and repair services and government services not included elsewhere. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.