Latvia vs Low income: Communications, computer, etc.
Communications, computer, etc. over time
- Latvia
- Low income
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 47.6% against 23.0% in Low income, a difference of 24.6%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 2.1 times Low income's.
Across all 15 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 46th and Low income ranks 45th of 198 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Low income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.4% | 22.9% | 5.6% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 34.6% | 25.5% | 9.2% | Latvia |
| 2020s | 50.1% | 26.6% | 23.5% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communications, computer, etc., Latvia or Low income?
- Latvia, at 47.6% against 23.0% in Low income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in communications, computer, etc. between Latvia and Low income?
- 24.6%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Low income?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Latvia and Low income rank globally for communications, computer, etc.?
- Latvia ranks 46th and Low income ranks 45th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Communications, computer, information, and other services cover international telecommunications; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; personal, cultural, and recreational services; manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others; and maintenance and repair services and government services not included elsewhere. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.