Kiribati vs Oman: Communications, computer, etc.
Communications, computer, etc. over time
- Kiribati
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 18.4% against 17.4% in Kiribati, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.1 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 35 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Oman ahead.
Kiribati ranks 151st and Oman ranks 149th of 198 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Oman in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 3.8% | 39.2% | 35.4% | Oman |
| 1980s | 13.3% | 51.5% | 38.3% | Oman |
| 1990s | 20.4% | 51.4% | 31.0% | Oman |
| 2000s | 19.9% | 34.8% | 15.0% | Oman |
| 2010s | 10.8% | 30.3% | 19.5% | Oman |
| 2020s | 28.4% | 25.6% | 2.8% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communications, computer, etc., Kiribati or Oman?
- Oman, at 18.4% against 17.4% in Kiribati as of 2024.
- What is the difference in communications, computer, etc. between Kiribati and Oman?
- 1.0%, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Oman?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Oman rank globally for communications, computer, etc.?
- Kiribati ranks 151st and Oman ranks 149th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Communications, computer, information, and other services cover international telecommunications; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; personal, cultural, and recreational services; manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others; and maintenance and repair services and government services not included elsewhere. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.