Kazakhstan vs Mexico: Communications, computer, etc.
Communications, computer, etc. over time
- Kazakhstan
- Mexico
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 33.3% against 32.6% in Mexico, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 105th and Mexico ranks 107th of 198 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 3 and Mexico in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 22.6% | 18.0% | 4.6% | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 11.2% | 24.3% | 13.1% | Mexico |
| 2010s | 38.3% | 31.3% | 6.9% | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 41.3% | 34.2% | 7.1% | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communications, computer, etc., Kazakhstan or Mexico?
- Kazakhstan, at 33.3% against 32.6% in Mexico as of 2025.
- What is the difference in communications, computer, etc. between Kazakhstan and Mexico?
- 0.7%, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Mexico?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2025.
- How do Kazakhstan and Mexico rank globally for communications, computer, etc.?
- Kazakhstan ranks 105th and Mexico ranks 107th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Communications, computer, information, and other services cover international telecommunications; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; personal, cultural, and recreational services; manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others; and maintenance and repair services and government services not included elsewhere. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.