Italy vs Latvia: Communications, computer, etc.
Communications, computer, etc. over time
- Italy
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 47.6% against 47.4% in Italy, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 47th and Latvia ranks 46th of 198 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 30.7% | 21.8% | 8.9% | Italy |
| 2000s | 43.5% | 28.4% | 15.0% | Italy |
| 2010s | 42.7% | 34.6% | 8.1% | Italy |
| 2020s | 48.3% | 48.7% | 0.4% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communications, computer, etc., Italy or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 47.6% against 47.4% in Italy as of 2025.
- What is the difference in communications, computer, etc. between Italy and Latvia?
- 0.2%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Latvia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Italy and Latvia rank globally for communications, computer, etc.?
- Italy ranks 47th and Latvia ranks 46th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Communications, computer, information, and other services cover international telecommunications; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; personal, cultural, and recreational services; manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others; and maintenance and repair services and government services not included elsewhere. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.