Iceland vs Zimbabwe: Communications, computer, etc.
Communications, computer, etc. over time
- Iceland
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 40.7% against 39.9% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1977 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Iceland ranks 74th and Zimbabwe ranks 77th of 198 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 10.9% | 16.1% | 5.1% | Zimbabwe |
| 1980s | 14.3% | 32.5% | 18.2% | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | 19.7% | 35.0% | 15.3% | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 41.1% | 38.5% | 2.6% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 36.8% | 33.6% | 3.2% | Iceland |
| 2020s | 47.0% | 37.7% | 9.4% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communications, computer, etc., Iceland or Zimbabwe?
- Iceland, at 40.7% against 39.9% in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
- What is the difference in communications, computer, etc. between Iceland and Zimbabwe?
- 0.8%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Zimbabwe?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1977 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Zimbabwe rank globally for communications, computer, etc.?
- Iceland ranks 74th and Zimbabwe ranks 77th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Communications, computer, information, and other services cover international telecommunications; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; personal, cultural, and recreational services; manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others; and maintenance and repair services and government services not included elsewhere. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.