High income vs Japan: Communications, computer, etc.
Communications, computer, etc. over time
- High income
- Japan
How they compare
Japan currently reports 65.0% against 50.0% in High income, a difference of 15.0%.
That makes Japan's figure about 1.3 times High income's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Japan ahead.
High income ranks 11th and Japan ranks 9th of 47 groups.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | High income | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 37.7% | 44.9% | 7.2% | Japan |
| 2000s | 41.3% | 44.6% | 3.3% | Japan |
| 2010s | 48.1% | 58.1% | 10.1% | Japan |
| 2020s | 54.2% | 68.7% | 14.5% | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communications, computer, etc., High income or Japan?
- Japan, at 65.0% against 50.0% in High income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in communications, computer, etc. between High income and Japan?
- 15.0%, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Japan?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do High income and Japan rank globally for communications, computer, etc.?
- High income ranks 11th and Japan ranks 9th of 47 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Communications, computer, information, and other services cover international telecommunications; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; personal, cultural, and recreational services; manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others; and maintenance and repair services and government services not included elsewhere. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.