French Polynesia vs Pakistan: Communications, computer, etc.
Communications, computer, etc. over time
- French Polynesia
- Pakistan
How they compare
French Polynesia currently reports 24.2% against 23.8% in Pakistan, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2002 it was French Polynesia ahead.
French Polynesia ranks 133rd and Pakistan ranks 134th of 198 countries.
Pakistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | French Polynesia | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 25.7% | 33.2% | 7.5% | Pakistan |
| 2010s | 21.2% | 32.2% | 11.0% | Pakistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communications, computer, etc., French Polynesia or Pakistan?
- French Polynesia, at 24.2% against 23.8% in Pakistan as of 2016.
- What is the difference in communications, computer, etc. between French Polynesia and Pakistan?
- 0.4%, with French Polynesia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Pakistan?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2016.
- How do French Polynesia and Pakistan rank globally for communications, computer, etc.?
- French Polynesia ranks 133rd and Pakistan ranks 134th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Communications, computer, information, and other services cover international telecommunications; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; personal, cultural, and recreational services; manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others; and maintenance and repair services and government services not included elsewhere. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.