Finland vs Israel: Communications, computer, etc.
Communications, computer, etc. over time
- Finland
- Israel
How they compare
Finland currently reports 64.0% against 59.9% in Israel, a difference of 4.1%.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.
Across all 51 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 11th and Israel ranks 14th of 198 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 32.9% | 22.4% | 10.6% | Finland |
| 1980s | 36.5% | 26.9% | 9.6% | Finland |
| 1990s | 43.4% | 29.8% | 13.6% | Finland |
| 2000s | 51.5% | 42.5% | 9.0% | Finland |
| 2010s | 54.1% | 48.5% | 5.6% | Finland |
| 2020s | 66.5% | 62.1% | 4.4% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communications, computer, etc., Finland or Israel?
- Finland, at 64.0% against 59.9% in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in communications, computer, etc. between Finland and Israel?
- 4.1%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Israel?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2025.
- How do Finland and Israel rank globally for communications, computer, etc.?
- Finland ranks 11th and Israel ranks 14th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Communications, computer, information, and other services cover international telecommunications; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; personal, cultural, and recreational services; manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others; and maintenance and repair services and government services not included elsewhere. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.