Estonia vs Grenada: Communications, computer, etc.
Communications, computer, etc. over time
- Estonia
- Grenada
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 58.8% against 55.5% in Grenada, a difference of 3.3%.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Grenada's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 16th and Grenada ranks 19th of 198 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31.7% | 32.9% | 1.2% | Grenada |
| 2000s | 30.3% | 46.8% | 16.5% | Grenada |
| 2010s | 33.2% | 50.4% | 17.2% | Grenada |
| 2020s | 57.6% | 60.2% | 2.5% | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communications, computer, etc., Estonia or Grenada?
- Estonia, at 58.8% against 55.5% in Grenada as of 2025.
- What is the difference in communications, computer, etc. between Estonia and Grenada?
- 3.3%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Grenada?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Estonia and Grenada rank globally for communications, computer, etc.?
- Estonia ranks 16th and Grenada ranks 19th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Communications, computer, information, and other services cover international telecommunications; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; personal, cultural, and recreational services; manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others; and maintenance and repair services and government services not included elsewhere. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.