Ecuador vs Kenya: Communications, computer, etc.
Communications, computer, etc. over time
- Ecuador
- Kenya
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 28.2% against 27.2% in Kenya, a difference of 1.0%.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Kenya ahead.
Ecuador ranks 120th and Kenya ranks 123rd of 198 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Kenya in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 13.3% | 25.3% | 12.0% | Kenya |
| 1980s | 20.2% | 25.8% | 5.6% | Kenya |
| 1990s | 35.7% | 34.2% | 1.6% | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 27.0% | 36.0% | 8.9% | Kenya |
| 2010s | 20.8% | 26.3% | 5.4% | Kenya |
| 2020s | 29.4% | 28.7% | 0.7% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communications, computer, etc., Ecuador or Kenya?
- Ecuador, at 28.2% against 27.2% in Kenya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in communications, computer, etc. between Ecuador and Kenya?
- 1.0%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kenya?
- 49 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2024.
- How do Ecuador and Kenya rank globally for communications, computer, etc.?
- Ecuador ranks 120th and Kenya ranks 123rd of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Communications, computer, information, and other services cover international telecommunications; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; personal, cultural, and recreational services; manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others; and maintenance and repair services and government services not included elsewhere. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.