Brazil vs Korea: Communications, computer, etc.
Communications, computer, etc. over time
- Brazil
- Korea
How they compare
Korea currently reports 55.9% against 55.3% in Brazil, a difference of 0.6%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 50 shared years of data; in 1976 it was Korea ahead.
Brazil ranks 20th and Korea ranks 18th of 198 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Korea in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 34.6% | 43.0% | 8.4% | Korea |
| 1980s | 36.8% | 39.1% | 2.2% | Korea |
| 1990s | 32.3% | 37.2% | 4.8% | Korea |
| 2000s | 45.5% | 39.8% | 5.7% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 53.0% | 48.8% | 4.2% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 55.2% | 57.5% | 2.4% | Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communications, computer, etc., Brazil or Korea?
- Korea, at 55.9% against 55.3% in Brazil as of 2025.
- What is the difference in communications, computer, etc. between Brazil and Korea?
- 0.6%, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Korea?
- 50 years are reported by both, from 1976 to 2025.
- How do Brazil and Korea rank globally for communications, computer, etc.?
- Brazil ranks 20th and Korea ranks 18th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Communications, computer, information, and other services cover international telecommunications; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; personal, cultural, and recreational services; manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others; and maintenance and repair services and government services not included elsewhere. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.