Brazil vs Congo: Communications, computer, etc.
Communications, computer, etc. over time
- Brazil
- Congo
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 55.3% against 55.2% in Congo, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 42 shared years of data; in 1978 it was Congo ahead.
Brazil ranks 20th and Congo ranks 21st of 198 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 37.8% | 49.2% | 11.4% | Congo |
| 1980s | 36.8% | 58.1% | 21.3% | Congo |
| 1990s | 32.3% | 71.8% | 39.5% | Congo |
| 2000s | 45.5% | 68.8% | 23.3% | Congo |
| 2010s | 52.9% | 58.7% | 5.8% | Congo |
| 2020s | 59.5% | 63.4% | 3.9% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communications, computer, etc., Brazil or Congo?
- Brazil, at 55.3% against 55.2% in Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in communications, computer, etc. between Brazil and Congo?
- 0.1%, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Congo?
- 42 years are reported by both, from 1978 to 2021.
- How do Brazil and Congo rank globally for communications, computer, etc.?
- Brazil ranks 20th and Congo ranks 21st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Communications, computer, information, and other services cover international telecommunications; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; personal, cultural, and recreational services; manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others; and maintenance and repair services and government services not included elsewhere. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.