Bhutan vs Naoero: Communications, computer, etc.
Communications, computer, etc. over time
- Bhutan
- Naoero
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 8.4% against 8.1% in Naoero, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Naoero ahead.
Bhutan ranks 182nd and Naoero ranks 184th of 198 countries.
Naoero has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Naoero | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -7.6% | 11.1% | 18.7% | Naoero |
| 2010s | -3.9% | 16.7% | 20.7% | Naoero |
| 2020s | -2.5% | 9.3% | 11.8% | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communications, computer, etc., Bhutan or Naoero?
- Bhutan, at 8.4% against 8.1% in Naoero as of 2024.
- What is the difference in communications, computer, etc. between Bhutan and Naoero?
- 0.3%, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Naoero?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Naoero rank globally for communications, computer, etc.?
- Bhutan ranks 182nd and Naoero ranks 184th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Communications, computer, etc. (% of service imports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Communications, computer, information, and other services cover international telecommunications; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; personal, cultural, and recreational services; manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others; and maintenance and repair services and government services not included elsewhere. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service imports which are services provided by non-residents to residents.