Naoero vs Papua New Guinea: Communications, computer, etc.
Communications, computer, etc. over time
- Naoero
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 96.7% against 87.6% in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 9.1%.
That makes Naoero's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Naoero ranks 2nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 3rd of 197 countries.
Papua New Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Naoero | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.4% | 69.9% | 63.6% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2010s | 14.0% | 69.7% | 55.7% | Papua New Guinea |
| 2020s | 66.3% | 75.1% | 8.8% | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communications, computer, etc., Naoero or Papua New Guinea?
- Naoero, at 96.7% against 87.6% in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in communications, computer, etc. between Naoero and Papua New Guinea?
- 9.1%, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and Papua New Guinea?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do Naoero and Papua New Guinea rank globally for communications, computer, etc.?
- Naoero ranks 2nd and Papua New Guinea ranks 3rd of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Communications, computer, etc. (% of service exports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Communications, computer, information, and other services cover international telecommunications; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; personal, cultural, and recreational services; manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others; and maintenance and repair services and government services not included elsewhere. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service exports which are services provided by residents to non-residents.