Kyrgyzstan vs Latvia: Communications, computer, etc.
Communications, computer, etc. over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Latvia
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 42.3% against 41.8% in Latvia, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 45th and Latvia ranks 48th of 197 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 51.7% | 14.8% | 37.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2000s | 22.4% | 10.4% | 12.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2010s | 24.1% | 22.0% | 2.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 23.7% | 39.7% | 16.1% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communications, computer, etc., Kyrgyzstan or Latvia?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 42.3% against 41.8% in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in communications, computer, etc. between Kyrgyzstan and Latvia?
- 0.5%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Latvia?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Latvia rank globally for communications, computer, etc.?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 45th and Latvia ranks 48th of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Communications, computer, etc. (% of service exports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Communications, computer, information, and other services cover international telecommunications; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; personal, cultural, and recreational services; manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others; and maintenance and repair services and government services not included elsewhere. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service exports which are services provided by residents to non-residents.