Belarus vs Low income: Communications, computer, etc.
Communications, computer, etc. over time
- Belarus
- Low income
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 45.4% against 18.1% in Low income, a difference of 27.3%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 2.5 times Low income's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Low income ahead.
Belarus ranks 41st and Low income ranks 42nd of 197 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Low income in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Low income | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.7% | 29.1% | 5.4% | Low income |
| 2010s | 31.2% | 24.9% | 6.3% | Belarus |
| 2020s | 44.7% | 24.0% | 20.7% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher communications, computer, etc., Belarus or Low income?
- Belarus, at 45.4% against 18.1% in Low income as of 2021.
- What is the difference in communications, computer, etc. between Belarus and Low income?
- 27.3%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Low income?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2021.
- How do Belarus and Low income rank globally for communications, computer, etc.?
- Belarus ranks 41st and Low income ranks 42nd of 197 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Communications, computer, etc. (% of service exports, BoP). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Communications, computer, information, and other services cover international telecommunications; computer data; news-related service transactions between residents and nonresidents; construction services; royalties and license fees; miscellaneous business, professional, and technical services; personal, cultural, and recreational services; manufacturing services on physical inputs owned by others; and maintenance and repair services and government services not included elsewhere. This indicator is expressed as a percentage of service exports which are services provided by residents to non-residents.