Bermuda vs Chile: Inequality of food consumption vs. GDP per capita
Bermuda
0.24
in 2020
Chile
0.24
in 2020
Bermuda rank
107th
Chile rank
107th
Inequality of food consumption vs. GDP per capita over time
- Bermuda
- Chile
How they compare
Bermuda currently reports 0.24 against 0.24 in Chile, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bermuda ahead.
Bermuda ranks 107th and Chile ranks 107th of 185 countries.
Bermuda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.24 | 0.22 | 0.02 | Bermuda |
| 2010s | 0.24 | 0.221 | 0.019 | Bermuda |
| 2020s | 0.24 | 0.24 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher inequality of food consumption vs. gdp per capita, Bermuda or Chile?
- Bermuda, at 0.24 against 0.24 in Chile as of 2020.
- What is the difference in inequality of food consumption vs. gdp per capita between Bermuda and Chile?
- 0, with Bermuda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Chile?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
- How do Bermuda and Chile rank globally for inequality of food consumption vs. gdp per capita?
- Bermuda ranks 107th and Chile ranks 107th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- FAO (2017) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Inequality of food consumption vs. GDP per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Inequality of food consumption is measured by the coefficient of variation in per capita caloric consumption. Higher values represent larger levels of dietary inequality. GDP per capita is adjusted for inflation and differences in living costs between countries.