Libya vs Samoa: Cocoa bean consumption per person
Libya
2.67 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Samoa
2.49 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Libya rank
29th
Samoa rank
32nd
Cocoa bean consumption per person over time
- Libya
- Samoa
How they compare
Libya currently reports 2.67 kilograms per year per capita against 2.49 kilograms per year per capita in Samoa, a difference of 0.18 kilograms per year per capita.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Samoa's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Samoa ahead.
Libya ranks 29th and Samoa ranks 32nd of 191 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.8 kilograms per year per capita | 2.73 kilograms per year per capita | 0.9258 kilograms per year per capita | Samoa |
| 2020s | 2.01 kilograms per year per capita | 2.31 kilograms per year per capita | 0.3049 kilograms per year per capita | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher cocoa bean consumption per person, Libya or Samoa?
- Libya, at 2.67 kilograms per year per capita against 2.49 kilograms per year per capita in Samoa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in cocoa bean consumption per person between Libya and Samoa?
- 0.18 kilograms per year per capita, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Samoa?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
- How do Libya and Samoa rank globally for cocoa bean consumption per person?
- Libya ranks 29th and Samoa ranks 32nd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Cocoa bean consumption per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.