Antigua and Barbuda vs Macau, China: Cocoa bean consumption per person

Antigua and Barbuda
1.59 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Macau, China
1.71 kilograms per year per capita
in 2023
Antigua and Barbuda rank
56th
Macau, China rank
53rd

Cocoa bean consumption per person over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Macau, China
0123196119922023

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 1.71 kilograms per year per capita against 1.59 kilograms per year per capita in Antigua and Barbuda, a difference of 0.12 kilograms per year per capita.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 1.1 times Antigua and Barbuda's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 56th and Macau, China ranks 53rd of 192 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 4 and Macau, China in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Macau, China Difference Ahead
1960s 0.9373 kilograms per year per capita 0.0245 kilograms per year per capita 0.9127 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda
1970s 1.33 kilograms per year per capita 0.0069 kilograms per year per capita 1.33 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda
1980s 0.4499 kilograms per year per capita 0.39 kilograms per year per capita 0.0599 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda
1990s 0.4244 kilograms per year per capita 0.8979 kilograms per year per capita 0.4735 kilograms per year per capita Macau, China
2000s 1.06 kilograms per year per capita 1.03 kilograms per year per capita 0.035 kilograms per year per capita Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 1.13 kilograms per year per capita 1.55 kilograms per year per capita 0.4202 kilograms per year per capita Macau, China
2020s 1.15 kilograms per year per capita 1.51 kilograms per year per capita 0.3626 kilograms per year per capita Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher cocoa bean consumption per person, Antigua and Barbuda or Macau, China?
Macau, China, at 1.71 kilograms per year per capita against 1.59 kilograms per year per capita in Antigua and Barbuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in cocoa bean consumption per person between Antigua and Barbuda and Macau, China?
0.12 kilograms per year per capita, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Macau, China?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Macau, China rank globally for cocoa bean consumption per person?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 56th and Macau, China ranks 53rd of 192 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Cocoa bean consumption per person. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Macau, China: Cocoa bean consumption per person. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/chocolate-consumption-per-person/antigua-and-barbuda/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/chocolate-consumption-per-person/antigua-and-barbuda/macao-sar-china/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Macau, China: Cocoa bean consumption per person</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Cocoa bean consumption per person
Unit
kilograms per year per capita
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2025) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
192 places, 10,203 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Quantity that is available for consumption at the end of the supply chain. It does not account for consumer waste, so the quantity that is actually consumed may be lower.