Hong Kong, China vs Norway: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts

Hong Kong, China
709.99 million BoP, current US$
in 2023
Norway
621.51 million BoP, current US$
in 2025
Hong Kong, China rank
30th
Norway rank
32nd

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Norway
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M197520002025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 709.99 million BoP, current US$ against 621.51 million BoP, current US$ in Norway, a difference of 88.48 million BoP, current US$.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 30th and Norway ranks 32nd of 154 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 3 and Norway in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 116.52 million BoP, current US$ 119.11 million BoP, current US$ 2.59 million BoP, current US$ Norway
2000s 271.51 million BoP, current US$ 224.40 million BoP, current US$ 47.11 million BoP, current US$ Hong Kong, China
2010s 615.17 million BoP, current US$ 462.39 million BoP, current US$ 152.78 million BoP, current US$ Hong Kong, China
2020s 715.97 million BoP, current US$ 475.38 million BoP, current US$ 240.59 million BoP, current US$ Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts, Hong Kong, China or Norway?
Hong Kong, China, at 709.99 million BoP, current US$ against 621.51 million BoP, current US$ in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts between Hong Kong, China and Norway?
88.48 million BoP, current US$, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Norway?
21 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Norway rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts?
Hong Kong, China ranks 30th and Norway ranks 32nd of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Norway: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts. Statizoid, drawing on Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us/hong-kong-sar-china/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us/hong-kong-sar-china/norway/">Hong Kong, China vs Norway: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$)
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Balance of Payments Statistics Yearbook and data files, International Monetary Fund (IMF)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
201 places, 6,433 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of proprietary rights (such as patents, trademarks, copyrights, industrial processes and designs including trade secrets, franchises), and charges for licenses to reproduce or distribute (or both) intellectual property embodied in produced originals or prototypes (such as copyrights on books and manuscripts, computer software, cinematographic works, and sound recordings) and related rights (such as for live performances and television, cable, or satellite broadcast). This indicator is expressed in current prices, meaning no adjustment has been made to account for price changes over time. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.