OECD members vs Singapore: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

OECD members
13,410 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
24.29 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members rank
4th
Singapore rank
1st

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

  • OECD members
  • Singapore
05.0M10.0M15.0M20.0M25.0M196719952023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 24.29 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 13,410 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 24.28 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1,811.6 times OECD members's.

Across all 29 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

OECD members ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 1st of 47 groups.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade OECD members Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 1,604 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 75,459 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 73,855 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 4,097 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 837,532 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 833,435 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 8,898 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7.95 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7.94 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 12,713 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 18.08 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 18.07 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), OECD members or Singapore?
Singapore, at 24.29 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 13,410 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between OECD members and Singapore?
24.28 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for OECD members and Singapore?
29 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2023.
How do OECD members and Singapore rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
OECD members ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 1st of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

OECD members vs Singapore: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/oecd-members/singapore/">OECD members vs Singapore: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 6,099 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.