Malta vs OECD members: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

Malta
605,288 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
OECD members
13,410 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
6th
OECD members rank
4th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

  • Malta
  • OECD members
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196719952023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 605,288 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 13,410 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members, a difference of 591,878 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 45.1 times OECD members's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 6th and OECD members ranks 4th of 151 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Malta averaged higher in 4 and OECD members in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta OECD members Difference Ahead
1980s 878.81 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 487.3 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 391.5 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
1990s 845.8 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,151 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 305.16 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre OECD members
2000s 874,518 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,097 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 870,421 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2010s 1.52 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 8,898 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1.51 million BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta
2020s 573,364 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 12,713 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 560,651 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), Malta or OECD members?
Malta, at 605,288 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 13,410 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in OECD members as of 2023.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between Malta and OECD members?
591,878 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and OECD members?
36 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2023.
How do Malta and OECD members rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
Malta ranks 6th and OECD members ranks 4th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs OECD members: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/oecd-members/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/malta/oecd-members/">Malta vs OECD members: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 6,099 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.