Jordan vs Latvia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

Jordan
161.79 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
156.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
73rd
Latvia rank
75th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

  • Jordan
  • Latvia
0100200300400199220072023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 161.79 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 156.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 5.51 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 73rd and Latvia ranks 75th of 151 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Latvia Difference Ahead
2010s 208.25 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 147.56 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 60.68 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Jordan
2020s 171.71 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 194.58 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 22.88 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), Jordan or Latvia?
Jordan, at 161.79 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 156.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2023.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between Jordan and Latvia?
5.51 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Latvia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Latvia rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
Jordan ranks 73rd and Latvia ranks 75th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Latvia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jordan/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/jordan/latvia/">Jordan vs Latvia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 6,099 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.