Grenada vs Latvia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

Grenada
125.16 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Latvia
156.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Grenada rank
78th
Latvia rank
75th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

  • Grenada
  • Latvia
0100200300199220072023

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 156.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 125.16 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Grenada, a difference of 31.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Grenada's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Latvia ahead.

Grenada ranks 78th and Latvia ranks 75th of 151 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Grenada Latvia Difference Ahead
2000s 195.87 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 160.89 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 34.98 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Grenada
2010s 111.77 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 159.08 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 47.31 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 60.68 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 194.58 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 133.91 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), Grenada or Latvia?
Latvia, at 156.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 125.16 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Grenada as of 2023.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between Grenada and Latvia?
31.12 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Latvia?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Grenada and Latvia rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
Grenada ranks 78th and Latvia ranks 75th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Grenada vs Latvia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/grenada/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/grenada/latvia/">Grenada vs Latvia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 6,099 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.