Finland vs Spain: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

Finland
11,520 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Spain
8,386 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
28th
Spain rank
31st

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

  • Finland
  • Spain
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k197519992023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 11,520 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 8,386 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Spain, a difference of 3,134 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.4 times Spain's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1975 it was Spain ahead.

Finland ranks 28th and Spain ranks 31st of 151 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Spain in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Spain Difference Ahead
1970s 13.77 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 40.95 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 27.18 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Spain
1980s 50.55 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 69.18 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 18.63 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Spain
1990s 239.18 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 335.97 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 96.79 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Spain
2010s 10,240 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 4,135 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 6,105 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Finland
2020s 10,773 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 7,753 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,020 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), Finland or Spain?
Finland, at 11,520 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 8,386 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Spain as of 2023.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between Finland and Spain?
3,134 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Spain?
35 years are reported by both, from 1975 to 2023.
How do Finland and Spain rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
Finland ranks 28th and Spain ranks 31st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Spain: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/finland/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/finland/spain/">Finland vs Spain: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 6,099 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.