Egypt vs Latvia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

Egypt
157.01 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
Latvia
156.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
74th
Latvia rank
75th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

  • Egypt
  • Latvia
0100200300199220072023

How they compare

Egypt currently reports 157.01 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 156.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Latvia, a difference of 0.73 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 74th and Latvia ranks 75th of 151 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 50.53 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 39.36 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11.17 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Egypt
2010s 1.11 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 306.33 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 305.22 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Latvia
2020s 157.01 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 304.14 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 147.13 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), Egypt or Latvia?
Egypt, at 157.01 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 156.28 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Latvia as of 2022.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between Egypt and Latvia?
0.73 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Egypt ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Latvia?
7 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
How do Egypt and Latvia rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
Egypt ranks 74th and Latvia ranks 75th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Latvia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/egypt-arab-rep/latvia/">Egypt vs Latvia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 6,099 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.