Czechia vs Low & middle income: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

Czechia
12,379 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Low & middle income
212.85 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Czechia rank
26th
Low & middle income rank
23rd

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

  • Czechia
  • Low & middle income
02.5k5.0k7.5k10.0k12.5k196219922023

How they compare

Czechia currently reports 12,379 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 212.85 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income, a difference of 12,166 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Czechia's figure about 58.2 times Low & middle income's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 26th and Low & middle income ranks 23rd of 151 countries.

Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia Low & middle income Difference Ahead
1990s 360.82 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5.83 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 354.99 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2000s 833.96 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 19.21 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 814.75 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2010s 5,551 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 66.69 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 5,484 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Czechia
2020s 10,687 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 205.99 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10,481 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Czechia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), Czechia or Low & middle income?
Czechia, at 12,379 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 212.85 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Low & middle income as of 2023.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between Czechia and Low & middle income?
12,166 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Czechia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Low & middle income?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and Low & middle income rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
Czechia ranks 26th and Low & middle income ranks 23rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs Low & middle income: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/low-and-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/czechia/low-and-middle-income/">Czechia vs Low & middle income: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 6,099 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.