Curacao vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

Curacao
10,686 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
11,666 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Curacao rank
29th
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank
27th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

  • Curacao
  • Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k201120172023

How they compare

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) currently reports 11,666 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 10,686 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Curacao, a difference of 980 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sint Maarten (Dutch part)'s figure about 1.1 times Curacao's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.

Curacao ranks 29th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 27th of 151 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Curacao averaged higher in 1 and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Curacao Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Difference Ahead
2010s 12,891 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 24,729 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 11,838 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
2020s 13,773 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 10,229 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 3,544 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre Curacao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), Curacao or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
Sint Maarten (Dutch part), at 11,666 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 10,686 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Curacao as of 2023.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between Curacao and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
980 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Curacao and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
How do Curacao and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
Curacao ranks 29th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 27th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Curacao vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/curacao/sint-maarten-dutch-part/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/curacao/sint-maarten-dutch-part/">Curacao vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 6,099 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.