China vs Trinidad and Tobago: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

China
1,162 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
1,986 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
in 2022
China rank
46th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
43rd

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

  • China
  • Trinidad and Tobago
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199720102023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 1,986 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,162 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in China, a difference of 824 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 1.7 times China's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.

China ranks 46th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 43rd of 151 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
2010s 267.06 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 200.46 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 66.61 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre China
2020s 1,166 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 1,049 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre 116.77 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), China or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 1,986 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 1,162 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in China as of 2022.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between China and Trinidad and Tobago?
824 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Trinidad and Tobago?
11 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2022.
How do China and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
China ranks 46th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 43rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Trinidad and Tobago: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/china/trinidad-and-tobago/">China vs Trinidad and Tobago: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit
BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
198 places, 6,099 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.