How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Lithuania?

16 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Aruba vs Lithuania: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

Aruba

250.75 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

Lithuania

232.78 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre

in 2023

Aruba rank

65th

Lithuania rank

66th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

Aruba
Lithuania

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 250.75 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 232.78 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Lithuania, a difference of 17.97 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 65th and Lithuania ranks 66th of 151 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Aruba	Lithuania	Difference	Ahead
2000s	410.78 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre	13.44 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre	397.34 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre	Aruba
2010s	2,177 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre	549.58 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre	1,627 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre	Aruba
2020s	2,639 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre	170.05 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre	2,469 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre	Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), Aruba or Lithuania?: Aruba, at 250.75 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre against 232.78 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre in Lithuania as of 2023.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between Aruba and Lithuania?: 17.97 BoP, current US$ per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Lithuania?: 16 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Lithuania rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?: Aruba ranks 65th and Lithuania ranks 66th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Lithuania: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-per-square-kilometre/aruba/lithuania/">Aruba vs Lithuania: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), per square kilometre
Unit: BoP, current US$ per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 198 places, 6,099 data points, 1962–2023
Last refreshed: 27 September 2026

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.