Panama vs Rwanda: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time
- Panama
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 677,020 BoP, current US$ against 564,535 BoP, current US$ in Panama, a difference of 112,485 BoP, current US$.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Panama's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Panama ranks 119th and Rwanda ranks 117th of 154 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 27.89 million BoP, current US$ | 181,439 BoP, current US$ | 27.71 million BoP, current US$ | Panama |
| 2020s | 2.30 million BoP, current US$ | 570,557 BoP, current US$ | 1.73 million BoP, current US$ | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), Panama or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 677,020 BoP, current US$ against 564,535 BoP, current US$ in Panama as of 2024.
- What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between Panama and Rwanda?
- 112,485 BoP, current US$, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Rwanda?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Panama and Rwanda rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
- Panama ranks 119th and Rwanda ranks 117th of 154 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$) with 155 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.