Latvia vs Tunisia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

Latvia
20.37 million BoP, current US$
in 2025
Tunisia
19.94 million BoP, current US$
in 2024
Latvia rank
71st
Tunisia rank
72nd

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

  • Latvia
  • Tunisia
010.0M20.0M30.0M198920072025

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 20.37 million BoP, current US$ against 19.94 million BoP, current US$ in Tunisia, a difference of 426,900 BoP, current US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tunisia ahead.

Latvia ranks 71st and Tunisia ranks 72nd of 154 countries.

Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 1.57 million BoP, current US$ 3.34 million BoP, current US$ 1.77 million BoP, current US$ Tunisia
2000s 10.01 million BoP, current US$ 27.33 million BoP, current US$ 17.32 million BoP, current US$ Tunisia
2010s 9.90 million BoP, current US$ 23.88 million BoP, current US$ 13.98 million BoP, current US$ Tunisia
2020s 12.50 million BoP, current US$ 20.45 million BoP, current US$ 7.95 million BoP, current US$ Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), Latvia or Tunisia?
Latvia, at 20.37 million BoP, current US$ against 19.94 million BoP, current US$ in Tunisia as of 2025.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between Latvia and Tunisia?
426,900 BoP, current US$, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Tunisia?
25 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
How do Latvia and Tunisia rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
Latvia ranks 71st and Tunisia ranks 72nd of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Tunisia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/latvia/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/latvia/tunisia/">Latvia vs Tunisia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,588 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$) with 155 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.