Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Serbia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
185.62 million BoP, current US$
in 2025
Serbia
259.85 million BoP, current US$
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
39th
Serbia rank
39th

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Serbia
0100.0M200.0M300.0M197419992025

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 259.85 million BoP, current US$ against 185.62 million BoP, current US$ in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 74.23 million BoP, current US$.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.4 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ahead.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 39th and Serbia ranks 39th of 47 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 153.59 million BoP, current US$ 33.70 million BoP, current US$ 119.90 million BoP, current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2010s 87.04 million BoP, current US$ 46.63 million BoP, current US$ 40.40 million BoP, current US$ Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2020s 85.83 million BoP, current US$ 187.81 million BoP, current US$ 101.97 million BoP, current US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Serbia?
Serbia, at 259.85 million BoP, current US$ against 185.62 million BoP, current US$ in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Serbia?
74.23 million BoP, current US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Serbia?
19 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2025.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Serbia rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 39th and Serbia ranks 39th of 47 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Serbia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/serbia/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Serbia: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,588 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$) with 155 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.