Georgia vs Kenya: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)

Georgia
44.98 million BoP, current US$
in 2025
Kenya
41.53 million BoP, current US$
in 2024
Georgia rank
60th
Kenya rank
63rd

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current) over time

  • Georgia
  • Kenya
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M198720062025

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 44.98 million BoP, current US$ against 41.53 million BoP, current US$ in Kenya, a difference of 3.45 million BoP, current US$.

That makes Georgia's figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kenya ahead.

Georgia ranks 60th and Kenya ranks 63rd of 154 countries.

Kenya has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Kenya Difference Ahead
2000s 7.33 million BoP, current US$ 15.31 million BoP, current US$ 7.97 million BoP, current US$ Kenya
2010s 2.07 million BoP, current US$ 60.29 million BoP, current US$ 58.22 million BoP, current US$ Kenya
2020s 11.55 million BoP, current US$ 48.99 million BoP, current US$ 37.44 million BoP, current US$ Kenya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current), Georgia or Kenya?
Georgia, at 44.98 million BoP, current US$ against 41.53 million BoP, current US$ in Kenya as of 2025.
What is the difference in charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current) between Georgia and Kenya?
3.45 million BoP, current US$, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Kenya?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Georgia and Kenya rank globally for charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (bop, current)?
Georgia ranks 60th and Kenya ranks 63rd of 154 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Kenya: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 28 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/georgia/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/charges-for-the-use-of-intellectual-property-receipts-bop-current-us-gaps-filled/georgia/kenya/">Georgia vs Kenya: Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$), gaps filled
Unit
BoP, current US$
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
201 places, 6,588 data points, 1962–2025
Last refreshed

Charges for the use of intellectual property, receipts (BoP, current US$) with 155 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.